Cases 81 - 90 of 547
EVANS v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 5:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
WESLEY EVANS
Defendant:
E HERNANDEZ, DR J LAY, DR E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baalim v. USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert KO Cody, II
Defendant:
USA, Inc., State of Florida, Orlando Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Connell v. Perez et al
as 1:2022cv21219
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Connell
Defendant:
Perez, Florez and Bruno Gonzalas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Baalim v. USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert KO Cody, II
Defendant:
USA, Inc., State of Florida, Orlando Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. NAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BERNARD THOMAS
Defendant:
RYAN NAGEL, DIMITRI WILSON, LIONEL ORTIZ-PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Neel Hardin
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Gloria Waldon, McGraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobet v. Dionisio et al
as 2:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Joseph Eric Bobet
Defendant:
Officer Dionisio, Officer Perez, Sergeant Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. ORTIZ et al
as 4:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
MARTHA PEREZ
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, A ORTIZ and E CARBONELI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. JOSEPH
as 3:2022cv02055
Petitioner:
ERNESTO PEREZ
Respondent:
M V JOSEPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Melendy v. Cerna et al
as 8:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Melendy and Mitchel Anthony Melendy
Defendant:
FNA Cerna, FNU Stewart, FNU Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
