Cases 81 - 90 of 156
Williams v. Alcorn County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Luther Ray Williams
Defendant:
Alcorn County Jail, Mackie Saxton, Kevin Allstatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Staffs Host et al
as 3:2013cv00811
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Staffs Host, ARP Medical Counsolor, I.L.A.P. Administration Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies et al
as 4:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Remedies, Unknown Thomas, Unknown McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF Host Remedies et al
as 4:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF Host Remedies, Nurses, Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison v. Wilkerson County Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Henry Lavell Madison
Defendant:
Wilkerson County Correctional Facility, Unknown Bitts, Unknown Wiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. EMCF MDOC Director et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
James Curry
Defendant:
EMCF MDOC Director, Staff Host of Them, Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry, Jr. v. Gradie et al
as 4:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
James Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Gradie, Unknown McNeil, James Holmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Voyles v. MTC/Kitchen/Trinity Food Services et al
as 3:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Voyles
Defendant:
Scott Marquardt , Unknown Hartmann, Jerry Buscher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Lewis et al
as 3:2013cv00540
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chandler
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis, Robert Graham, Douglas Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Denmark
as 2:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Charles Anderson
Defendant:
Johnny Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
