Cases 81 - 90 of 104
Yancey v. Crow et al
as 5:2010cv03248
Plaintiff:
John B. Yancey
Defendant:
Sam A. Crow, Crow, Clothier & Associates, (fnu) Scrivner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gorbey v. Watts et al
as 5:2010cv03187
Plaintiff:
Michael Steven Gorbey
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, D. S. Dodrill, M. K. Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sands v. USA
as 2:2010cv02413
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Walter B. Sands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Azim Razzaq v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 5:2010cv03123
Plaintiff:
Karim M. Azim Razzaq
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, D. Volle, B. Limeweaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv03111
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Bureau of Prisons, William McCullum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 6:2010cv01122
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jonearl B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv03076
Petitioner:
Michael B. Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America and Johnnie Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Burgess
as 5:2010cv03035
Petitioner:
Jesse B. Williams
Respondent:
Benjamin L. Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Roberts
as 5:2009cv03148
Petitioner:
Marcus B. Washington
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services et al
as 5:2009cv03091
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Davis
Defendant:
Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services, Carol J. Bacon, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
