Cases 81 - 90 of 661
Clayton v. Murray, et al
as 6:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ernest Clayton
Defendant:
Dennis Murray, Emmitt Donahue, Brian Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OUTLAW v. OWENS et al
as 5:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
CALVIN OUTLAW
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, TERRY E BARNARD, ALBERT MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Cobble v. Pete Smith, et al
as 16-16606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
PETE SMITH, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and BRIAN OWENS
COBBLE v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, U S GOVERNMENT and PETE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. OWENS et al
as 4:2016cv00322
Respondent:
BRIAN OWENS and PETE SMITH
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobble v. U. S. Government et al
as 1:2016cv03537
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
U. S. Government, Brian Owens, Pete Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniel Cobble v. United States Government, et al
as 16-16147
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, PETE SMITH and BRIAN OWENS, Georgia Prison System Commissioner
Cobble v. United States Government et al
as 1:2016cv02921
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
United States Government, Brian Owens, Victor Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hesterlee v. Owens et al
as 1:2016cv02580
Plaintiff:
Neal F. Hesterlee
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Derek Boehringer, Terry Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fischer et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Angela Fischer and James Fischer
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia for Georgia Correctional Healthcare , Brian Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
