Cases 81 - 90 of 136
Colon v. United States Of America
as 1:2012cv04676
Petitioner:
Jose Colon
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Colon v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv03428
Petitioner:
Jose Colon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jenkins et al v. Bernard et al
as 1:2012cv01720
Respondent:
CO Bernard, Officer Castellano, Colon and others
Petitioner:
Eric Steven Gay, Naquan Horne, Wendell Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins et al v. Bernard et al
as 1:2012cv02024
Plaintiff:
Wendell Jenkins, Naquan Horne, Antoine Morris and others
Defendant:
Bernard, Jane Does, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01864
Plaintiff:
William Hill
Defendant:
City of New York, Ray/Raymond Kelly, Robert Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 9:2012cv00321
Petitioner:
Armando Colon
Respondent:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. Schriro et al
as 1:2012cv01331
Plaintiff:
Ruben Rivera
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Artemio Colon, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. DOCS of New York City et al
as 1:2011cv09117
Plaintiff:
Hubert Cary
Defendant:
Manhattan Detention Center Corrections Officers, AMKC-C95 Correction Officers and Nurses, and Doctors, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. NYC DOCS, Medical Dept. and Mental Health Dept. et al
as 1:2011cv09002
Plaintiff:
Hubert Cary
Defendant:
Jean Bastiste, Pepe, Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv08288
Plaintiff:
Victor Colon
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Dora Schriro and Codea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
