Cases 81 - 90 of 196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Lowell Green v. State of Texas, et al
as 17-50948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HONORABLE MATT JOHNSON, PROSECUTOR BRANDON LUKE and others
Mount v. Court of Criminal Appeals et al
as 4:2017cv03056
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Mount
Defendant:
Court of Criminal Appeals, Katherine Cabaniss and John Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mount v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2017cv02987
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Mount
Defendant:
John Wakefield, Katherine Cabaniss, Court of Criminal Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Whaley v. Court of Cr Appeals of Texas, et al
as 17-11013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE WHALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PARDONS & PAROLES, JUDGE OF 282ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT and others
McClure v. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals et al
as 1:2017cv00842
Defendant:
Elsa Alcala, Rudolph Brothers, Joseph Buttitta and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowell Green v. State of Texas, et al
as 17-50648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, HONORABLE MATT JOHNSON, PROSECUTOR BRANDON LUKE and others
Fletcher v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
as 4:2017cv00543
Petitioner:
Jarene Fletcher
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00567
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Felton Matthews, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-15712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELTON L. MATTHEWS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
