Cases 81 - 90 of 183
Shugart v. Paxton et al
as 4:2015cv00875
Plaintiff:
Ricky J Shugart
Defendant:
Dan Paxton, Fannin County, Donnie Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shugart v. Paxton et al
as 6:2015cv01146
Plaintiff:
Ricky J Shugart
Defendant:
Dan Paxton, Fannin County, Donnie Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Kluck et al
as 6:2015cv00314
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Dustin H. Englutt, M. Franks, Richard W. Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Whitfield
as 4:2015cv00041
Notice Only Party:
Gloria Chandler, Leddocket and Elizabeth Mejia
Plaintiff:
Allen Robinson
Defendant:
Warden Dan Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Maldonado et al
as 6:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Martha A. Maldonado and Assistant Warden Rene Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grandberry v. Stephens
as 5:2014cv00852
Petitioner:
Dan Grandberry
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bilbo v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 5:2014cv00157
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Gary Dan Bilbo, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bilbo v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2014cv00152
Petitioner:
Gary Dan Bilbo, Sr
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel v. Stephens
as 6:2014cv00334
Petitioner:
Dan Daniel
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Childers v. McAfee et al
as 5:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Childers
Defendant:
Sonny McAfee, Judge Dan Mills and Texas Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
