Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Roughley v. Wright et al
as 7:2008cv00017
Plaintiff:
James A Roughley
Defendant:
Vikki Wright, John E Wilson, David Potter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chesnut v. Horton et al
as 2:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Lee Chesnut
Defendant:
Malcomb R Horton, Russell B Bockmon, Karl D Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00225
Petitioner:
Donnie T Horton
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Outley v. Zotz et al
as 7:2007cv00162
Plaintiff:
Darrell Keith Outley
Defendant:
Lacy Zotz, Danny Horton and Gary Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thunderhorse et al v. Smith et al
as 9:2007cv00239
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse and Ruth Thunderhorse
Defendant:
Ava Smith, Kathleen Chance, Michelle D Barksdale and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Mooneyham et al
as 7:2007cv00137
Plaintiff:
Destry E Thomas
Defendant:
James D Mooneyham, Danny R. Horton, Richard E Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holleman v. John or Jane Doe et al
as 7:2007cv00065
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Holleman
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe, Warden Moneyham, Warder Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langston v. Isaacks et al
as 4:2007cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Davis Langston
Defendant:
Bruce Isaacks, Michael B. Moore, J R Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Livingston et al
as 1:2007cv00106
Plaintiff:
Arnold Horton
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Lannette Linthicum, Jeanette Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Johnson et al
as 7:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Arthur Bates
Defendant:
Gary L Johnson, Danny Horton, James Mooneyham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
