Cases 81 - 90 of 115
Kelley v. Bowie County District Attorney Office et al
as 5:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Max Kelley
Defendant:
Bowie County District Attorney Office, Bowie County Sheriffs Office, Community Education Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckett v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2011cv00321
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
Ricky Gutierrez, J Eiselstine, Cindy Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguilar v. Johnson et al.
as 1:2011cv00491
Plaintiff:
Ruben Briseno Aguilar
Defendant:
J. Bartlett, FNU Ervin, C. Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton et al v. Lumpkins et al
as 3:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton and George J. Hatcher
Defendant:
Warner G Lumpkins, Phillip Sifuentes, Glenn Hopson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv00062
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Kelley
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanton v. Livingston et al
as 3:2011cv00202
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Linda C Hone, Warner G. Lumpkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Kelley et al
as 4:2011cv01537
Plaintiff:
Keith Bernard Payne
Defendant:
Christopher Kelley, Kirk Sistrunk and Lonnie Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2011cv00247
Defendant:
Austin Police Department, State of Texas and Travis County Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Tommy Joe Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Hamilton
as 1:2011cv00246
Defendant:
Greg Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Tommy Joe Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Leal et al
as 3:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Abel O Leal, Donna J Horn, Warner G Lumpkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
