Cases 81 - 90 of 139
JONES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv21629
Defendant:
MATTHEW MURPHY, MATTHEW KATZENBACH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
JONES N. RICCO and RICCO N. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv20490
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, GURBIR GREWAL, NEW JERSEY BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BARLOW v. STATE OF NJ GOVENOR PHILLIP MURPHY et al
as 3:2019cv16999
Respondent:
ANGELO J. ONOFRI, PHILLIP MURPHY, THOMAS M. BROWN and others
Petitioner:
CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CULLUM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY PHIL MURPHY et al
as 3:2019cv15677
Plaintiff:
JENNIE CULLUM
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY PHIL MURPHY, ASBURY PARK PRESS, LINDSAY ASHWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2019cv15775
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SERGEANT NEGREN, BRIAN M. HUGHES, GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HESTER v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2019cv04521
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR, WHARTON POLICE DEPT., ROBERT ASARO-ANGELO and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN D. HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTALDO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv14249
Defendant:
MARCUS HICKS, DAVE HOFFMAN, JPAY and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK CASTALDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2018cv10189
Plaintiff:
RICCO N. JONES
Defendant:
MATTHEW MURPHY, MATTHEW KATZENBACH, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. SESSIONS, ET AL.,
as 3:2017cv05475
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, THOMAS KANE, CARVAJAL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2017cv04007
Petitioner:
TYSHEIM MURPHY
Respondent:
PATRICK NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
