Cases 81 - 90 of 5,058
Silva v. Quarterman
as 5:2010cv00059
Petitioner:
Adam Silva
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dorsey v. Quarterman
as 4:2010cv01342
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Dorsey
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dorsey v. Quarterman DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 2:2010cv00102
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Dorsey
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Thaler
as 1:2010cv00236
:
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Guo v. Mellissa Wagstaff, et al
as 10-40275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE GUO
Defendant - Appellee:
MELLISSA WAGSTAFF, Individually and in her official capacity as Correctional Officer, ROBERT E. TWINE, Sergeant, HOPSON GLENN, JR., Captain and others
Vinson v. Kennedy et al
as 5:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Martin E Vinson
Defendant:
Eileen Kennedy, Dennis L Herron and Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Tuft v. State of Texas, et al
as 10-20135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A TUFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, VERNON PITTMAN, Warden-Jester 3, JEROLD BRAGGS, Assistant Warden, Jester 3 and others
Robert Tuft v. State of Texas, et al
as 10-20136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A TUFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, BRENDA CHANEY, former Warden of Jester 3 Unit, KATHREN GONZALES, Lieutenant of Correctional Office at the Jester 3 Unit and others
Gamble v. Quarterman et al
as 3:2010cv00443
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Gamble
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, NFN Cook and NFN Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NESBY v. QUARTERMAN
as 1:2010cv00288
Petitioner:
RODGY LEE NESBY
Respondent:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
