Cases 81 - 90 of 225
Larkins v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00107
Petitioner:
Ronnie Larkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solis-Caceres et al v. United States of America et al
as 0:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Robis Osuel Solis-Caceres
Defendant:
United States of America, Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital, Kenneth Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2013cv00076
Petitioner:
Kareem Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. United States of America et al
as 6:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
John Green
Defendant:
United States of America and Karen Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00102
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00510
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shaw v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
James L. Shaw, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00049
Petitioner:
Keith Bennett Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Holley v. Brown et al
as 2:2013cv00023
Petitioner:
Brian Holley
Respondent:
Allen D. Brown and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
