Cases 81 - 90 of 1,727
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
WADE L. WALKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brooks v. USA
as 2:2023cv00188
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Jaron Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Burns v. USA
as 3:2023cv00523
Petitioner:
Bradley Burns
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KADAMOVAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP), COLLETTE PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Blacharski v. USA
as 3:2023cv00521
Petitioner:
Brandyn Blacharski
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gibson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
David Gibson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griffis v. USA
as 3:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
Arielle Griffis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miller v. USA
as 3:2023cv00461
Petitioner:
Santana Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PERRYMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00892
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PERRYMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
