Cases 81 - 90 of 233
Peel v. United States of America President Obama et al
as 5:2014cv00340
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Peel
Respondent:
United States of America President Obama, Justice Department, Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sypher v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00472
Plaintiff:
Karen Cunagin Sypher
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marks v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00314
Petitioner:
James D. Marks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Christensen v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Herbert Samuel Christensen, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Francisco J. Quintana, David Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Taylor v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Stacy Allen Taylor
Defendant:
The United States of America, Western District of Kentucky, United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rice v. United States of America
as 7:2014cv00031
Petitioner:
Reginald Earl Rice
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Larkins v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00107
Petitioner:
Ronnie Larkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solis-Caceres et al v. United States of America et al
as 0:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Robis Osuel Solis-Caceres
Defendant:
United States of America, Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital, Kenneth Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2013cv00076
Petitioner:
Kareem Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
