Cases 81 - 90 of 344
Goodwin v. Askew et al
as 7:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
Joshua Goodwin
Defendant:
Sgt. Askew, State of New York, Westchester County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2019cv00307
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe(s) 1-25, All Unknown Entities, Jointly and Severally, Tony Stutter and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv12283
Plaintiff:
Talib Waters
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Correct Care Solutions (CCS), Westchester County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2018cv12048
Defendant:
Joseph Hall, Pamela Spencer, Joseph K. Spano and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Days v. Police Department et al
as 7:2018cv11538
Defendant:
County of Westchester, Eastchester Police Department, George Barletta and others
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Days
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Jan et al
as 7:2018cv11547
Defendant:
Keith Camera, ERT Unit of Westchester County Jail, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan H Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Westchester County Jail et al
as 7:2018cv11472
Defendant:
R.N. Bishop, ERT Unit of Westchester County Jail, Westchester County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan L Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv11410
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maldonado
Defendant:
Francis Delgrosso, LaFonda Spaulding, Leandro Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shkreli v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv10323
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Global Tel-Link, Westchester County and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Shkreli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. Westchester County Court
as 1:2018cv09795
Respondent:
Westchester County Court
Petitioner:
Kim Carl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
