Cases 81 - 90 of 152
KOMIS v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv05716
Plaintiff:
JASON KOMIS
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 3:2016cv05380
Plaintiff:
MICHOLE SANDERS
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, OCEAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOKES v. BOND et al
as 1:2016cv04818
Plaintiff:
JACQUAR STOKES
Defendant:
WILLIE BOND, MARK ROMANO, MACK SELBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. BOND et al
as 1:2016cv04816
Plaintiff:
ALONZO G. BROWN
Defendant:
WILLIE BOND, MARK ROMANO, MACK SELBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDEL-AZIZ v. BOND et al
as 1:2016cv04817
Plaintiff:
BILAL ABDEL-AZIZ
Defendant:
WILLIE BOND, MARK ROMANO, MACK SELBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. BOND et al
as 1:2016cv04815
Plaintiff:
HAKIEM BUTLER
Defendant:
WILLIE BOND, MARK ROMANO, MACK SELBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLBERT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv04165
Petitioner:
MARK TOLBERT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ABDEL-AZIZ v. BONDS et al
as 1:2016cv03600
Petitioner:
BILAL ABDEL-AZIZ
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOKES v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv03074
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J STOKES
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS, BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALEXANDER v. BOND et al
as 2:2016cv01903
Petitioner:
SHADEE ALEXANDER
Respondent:
WILLIE BOND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
