Cases 81 - 90 of 262
Woods v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv01542
Plaintiff:
Woods and Ruthie Woods
Defendant:
The City Of New York, NYC DOC CO Geraldine Williams, M.D. Habib Mohammad and others
Undetermined:
Bronx District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elleby v. DeRose et al
as 1:2015cv00883
Plaintiff:
Taye Elleby
Defendant:
M. DeRose, Jane Doe, Mark Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley v. Vance et al
as 1:2015cv00232
Defendant:
Backpage.com, LLC, Capital One, N.A., Giancarlo Cavallo and others
Plaintiff:
Royce Corley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Buess et al v. Scafide et al
as 1:2014cv07529
Defendant:
Frank Alberti, Judge Jerry Ault, Gregory J. Blass and others
Plaintiff:
David Buess, Winona Mae Palmiotti and Winona Rosa Piscitelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wood v. Maccarone
as 6:2014cv06639
Petitioner:
Scott M. Wood
Respondent:
Robert M. Maccarone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barrett v. Livingston County, New York et al
as 6:2014cv06593
Plaintiff:
Brian T. Barrett
Defendant:
Livingston County, New York, Thomas J. Dougherty, Randall S. Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Manhattan Detention Complex
as 7:2014cv06961
Plaintiff:
Ezra Woods
Defendant:
Manhattan Detention Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Miller et al
as 9:2014cv00996
Plaintiff:
Wesley Woods
Defendant:
Miller, Fuller and Warrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. New York City Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv06404
Plaintiff:
Gerald Gaines
Defendant:
Warden of Rikers Island A.M.K.C., John Doe, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Captain Flores et al
as 1:2014cv06297
Plaintiff:
Junaun Simmons
Defendant:
Captain Flores, C.O. Davis, C.O. Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
