Cases 81 - 90 of 618
Wallace et al v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Erik Michael Wallace, Montez Lamont Barker and Dallas Murphy-Johnson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, P. Gardner, Sgt. J. Muddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herman v. USA
as 6:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Terrion D Herman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sinkfield v. Paul
as 5:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
Maurice Jason Sinkfield
Respondent:
Warden D. Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Odom v. Ball et al
as 5:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jeremy Ball, Jennifer Parks-Burington and Ofc. Airington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Bruce et al
as 5:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jacob Bruce, Skyla Grief, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Syndab v. Gomez
as 6:2021cv00205
Petitioner:
Winston D Syndab
Respondent:
Warden Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pollard v. West et al
as 5:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Pollard, II
Defendant:
Captain Wesley J West, Captain S. Morgerson, Lt. R. Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Judd
as 3:2021cv00621
Petitioner:
Antonio Williamson
Respondent:
Joshua D. Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gott v. Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
De'Ontae Antwyan Gott
Defendant:
Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections, Srgt. G. Briles, Ofc. D. Higdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom et al v. Grief et al
as 5:2021cv00109
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom and Christopher A. Nuckols
Defendant:
Skyla Grief, Kentucky Parole Board, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
