Cases 81 - 90 of 14,276
Helm-Lyon v. Prosper
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
David A Helm-Lyon
Defendant:
Bridgett Prosper, James Muenchow and B Kolb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark v. Brenner et al
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M Mark
Defendant:
Mark Brenner, Melissa Rodriguez, Tyler Broderick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Jewell et al
as 2:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Chantell Jewell, Michael and Carlie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Vance v. Matushak, Anthony
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Vance H. Smith
Defendant:
Anthony Matushak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley, Brandon v. Schultz, Gwen et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Gwen Schultz, Sgt. Moore, CO Davenport and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sheppard and Antonio Decarlo Sheppard, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Matushak, Jody Perttu, CO Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Tritt et al
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bradley, Sr
Defendant:
Kyle Tritt, Joseph Beahm, Jesse Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson, Dennis v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Dennis E. Pearson, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Andrychowicz et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Lee
Defendant:
Candice Andrychowicz, Michelle Burton, J Schwizso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
