Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wilson v. Unknown Men/Man and/or Women(an) et al
as 9:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Brent Arthur Wilson
Defendant:
Unknown Men/Man and/or Women(an) d/b/a Trustee with Indenture Trust Bank
Cross Defendant:
Unknown Men/Women d/b/a Securities Underwriter for State of Montana Dpeartment of Corrections
Wilson v. Unkown Trustee et al
as 9:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Brent Arthur Wilson
Defendant:
Unkown Trustee, Unknown Indenture Trust Bank and Unknown Trustee
Couture v. Lake County Montana
as 9:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
James Arthur Couture
Respondent:
Lake County Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apodaca v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Arthur S. Apodaca
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Foster, Unit Manager Kambic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassel v. Dutton et al
as 6:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Arthur Cassel
Defendant:
Leo Dutton and C.O. Christ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. USA
as 2:2020cv00042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maxie Richard Arthur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wing v. Edwards et al
as 9:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Robert Arthur Wing, Helen Louise Wing and Robert Lewis Wing
Defendant:
Tyler Edwards, Brian Gault, All Unknown L.E.O.s Involved and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Fletcher et al
as 9:2017cv00145
Petitioner:
Brent Arthur Wilson
Respondent:
Michael Fletcher and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Couture v. Berkebile et al
as 9:2015cv00080
Petitioner:
James Arthur Couture
Respondent:
David Berkebile and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eklund v. Burkell et al
as 2:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Arthur John Eklund, Jr.
Defendant:
Burkell, John Sullivan, Joanne M. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
