Cases 1 - 10 of 6,749
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03097
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Escalante v. Droege
as 5:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Defendant:
Charles James Droege
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv03098
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC, Calvin Hayden, (fnu) Ehrlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collinge v. Bellendir
as 5:2024cv03096
Petitioner:
Adam B. Collinge
Respondent:
Brian Bellendir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chambers v. Carter
as 5:2024cv03094
Petitioner:
Roscoe Chambers
Respondent:
C. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Scott v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Scott
Defendant:
Gene Ward and Angie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. (lnu) (1) et al
as 5:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph West
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), (fnu) Carter, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Barnett
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Tommy Williams, Dana L. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Hemken
as 5:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
DeVonta B. Miller
Defendant:
Chianna Hemken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv03090
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC, (fnu) Ehrlich, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
