Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,278
Collick v. Marshall
as 1:2024cv01735
Plaintiff: Riley L. Collick and Lee Swole
Defendant: Maxine Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01742
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Bryson v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff: Nicholas Bryson
Defendant: Warden Shane Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Officers of the Clerk et al
as 1:2024cv01617
Plaintiff: Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant: Officers of the Clerk, All Employees, Official Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. North Branch Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv01645
Plaintiff: Joshua Colonna Jones, Joshua Jones and Joshua C. Jones
Defendant: North Branch Correctional Institution and Western Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ong v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv01717
Petitioner: Lye Huat Ong
Respondent: David Greene and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barmer v. Pentow
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff: David A. Barmer
Defendant: Alexander Pentow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holtzinger v. Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff: Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Defendant: Clerk Kevin R. Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner: James Watson
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01677
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?