Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Haro v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2024cv11532
Petitioner:
Noel Haro
Respondent:
Shawn P. Jenkins and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahdi v. Ryan et al
as 3:2023cv30040
Plaintiff:
Abdul Jaleel Mahdi, Irvin and Irvin William Jones
Defendant:
Mathew Ryan, Jr., Dianme F. Dillon, Francis John Good and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. USADO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE
as 4:2023cv40042
Petitioner:
Ryan Miller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tottenham v. Tsinteris et al
as 1:2022cv11520
Plaintiff:
Ryan Tottenham
Defendant:
Pamala Tsinteris, Sharif Nankoe, Douglas Demoura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Libertad v. Casey et al
as 1:2022cv10130
Plaintiff:
Lucha El Por Libertad and Steven Perez
Defendant:
Ryan Casey and Laurence D Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Daou et al
as 1:2021cv12056
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Margarita Daou, Sherry Hannen, Merdith Lobour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Barnstable Superior Court et al
as 1:2021cv11568
Plaintiff:
Steven Smith
Defendant:
Barnstable Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Governor Charles Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Matthews
as 1:2021cv10780
Defendant:
Attorney Ryan J Matthews
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bastos v. Micci et al
as 1:2021cv10228
Defendant:
Joshua D Ryan, Carol A Micci and Sheila Creighton Kelly
Plaintiff:
Carlos A Bastos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dealmeida v. Tucker et al
as 1:2020cv11410
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Department of Correction, C.O Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Mariam Dealmeida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
