Cases 1 - 10 of 473
(PC) Young v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01869
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, M. Leavens, R. Hibbard and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Baker v. Macomber et al
as 1:2024cv00737
Defendant:
Alva, Jeffrey Macomber and Brian Phillips
Plaintiff:
Jerome Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Baker v. Lozano et al
as 1:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Millard Wayne Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Lozano, Ortiz and Maurilio Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Marquez et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
G. Marquez, D. Baker and David Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rios v. Moya et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Jose Miguel Rios
Defendant:
Moya, Necochea, Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Baker v. Superior Courts of California
as 2:2024cv00476
Petitioner:
Jamaul Lee Baker
Respondent:
Superior Courts of California and Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Superior Courts of California
as 3:2024cv00449
Petitioner:
Jamaul Lee Baker
Respondent:
Superior Courts of California and Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Baker v. Cervantes
as 2:2023cv02610
Plaintiff:
James Ray Baker
Defendant:
Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Baker et al
as 1:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Lewis
Defendant:
Fredrick Baker, Chengdu Vantron Technologies Company Ltd., Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Baker et al
as 2:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Lewis
Defendant:
Fredrick Baker, Chengdu Vantron Technologies Company Ltd., Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
