Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Goff v. Crow et al
as 5:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Antoine Goff
Defendant:
Scott Crow, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baker v. GEO Lawton Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Xavier Montrell Baker
Defendant:
GEO Lawton Correctional Facility and FNU Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goff v. Crow et al
as 5:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Antoine Goff
Defendant:
Scott Crow, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Crow et al
as 5:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Antoine Davis
Defendant:
Director DOC Scott Crow, GEO Group Inc, Amber Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Crow
as 5:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
Bryson Imkah Baker
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Branden Shane Harris, Morgan Sanders, Wesley Huff and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Geo, Shawn Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Board of Commission
as 5:2021cv00344
Defendant:
Bryan Boudstun, Dub, Mike Kari and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Brett Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Breslin
as 4:2021cv00126
Petitioner:
Tammera Baker
Respondent:
Gregory P. Breslin, State of Oklahoma and Gregory P Breslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Breslin
as 6:2021cv00052
Petitioner:
Tammera Baker
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Gregory P. Breslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
