Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Weddington v. Patuxent Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01887
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Weddington
Defendant:
Patuxent Institution and Sgt. Dawn Hasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottman v. USA - 2255
as 1:2021cv03273
Petitioner:
Dawn Chapelle Cottman
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hollis v. Hawk et al
as 8:2018cv02653
Plaintiff:
Steven T. Hollis, III
Defendant:
Nurse Dawn Hawk and Wexford Health Sources Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Wicomico County Detention Center et al
as 8:2018cv02568
Defendant:
Deputy Tyler, Wicomico County Detention Center, Warden Ruth Colburne and others
Plaintiff:
Irving Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Curry v. Ashraf et al
as 1:2018cv02439
Defendant:
Mahboob Ashraf, Dawn Hawk, North Branch Correctional and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl J. Curry
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bryant-EL v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv01519
Plaintiff:
Cortney Bryant-EL
Defendant:
Dayena Corcoran, B. Ziler, D. Frazee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant-EL v. Corcoran et al.
as 1:2017cv03402
Plaintiff:
Cortney Bryant-EL
Defendant:
Dayeen M. Corcoran, Robin Woolford, Audrey Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellard v. Barrera, MD et al
as 1:2017cv02115
Plaintiff:
Darrell Bellard
Defendant:
Robustiano Barrera, MD, Mahboob Ashraf, M.D., Krista Dawn Self, R.N.P and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurel v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Barrera Robustiano, Ashboob Asraf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aurel v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Barrera Robustiano, Ashboob Asraf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
