Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Stubbs v. USA
as 6:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
John Duncan Stubbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Coplen v. Stephens County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Norman Coplen
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail, Duncan Police Department, Michael Elroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Stephens County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Juan Demetrius Hill and Juan-D Hill
Defendant:
Stephens County Sheriff, Oklahoma Attorney General, Govenor Kevin Stitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00536
Petitioner:
Jackie Duncan
Respondent:
FNU Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kirk v. Duncan OK City of et al
as 5:2021cv00259
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Trinidad CO Police Department, Lawton OK City of and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Josiah Kirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv01050
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jackie Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perkins v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thor Perkins
Defendant:
Grady County Criminal Justice Authority, Lisa Farris and Jimmy Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Crow et al
as 6:2019cv00368
Petitioner:
Desiray J Allen
Respondent:
Scott Crow and Jacqueline P Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Crow et al
as 5:2019cv00588
Petitioner:
Desiray J Allen
Respondent:
Jacqueline P Duncan, Joe M Allbaugh and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Prater et al
as 5:2018cv00585
Plaintiff:
George Cintroi Raavon Davis, III
Defendant:
David W Prater, Samantha Duncan, Kelly Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
