Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Royal v. Gregg County et al
as 6:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Devin Benard Royal
Defendant:
Gregg County, Jeffery K. Hale and Gregg County District Clerk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devaney v. Blankenship et al
as 4:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
David Allen Devaney, Sr.
Defendant:
Chief FNU Blankenship, Captain FNU Gordy, Sgt. FNU Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00163
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hallcy v. Hale County Commissioners et al
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Mark DeWayne Hallcy
Defendant:
Hale County Commissioners, David Mull, Wally Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Edgeworth et al
as 4:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jerome Porter
Defendant:
Honorable Jennifer Edgeworth, Amanda Solomon, Baileigh Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Edgeworth et al
as 3:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jerome Porter
Defendant:
Jennifer Edgeworth, Amanda Solomon, Baileigh Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adolph v. Hale County Jail
as 5:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Chad C Adolph
Defendant:
Hale County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing v. Hale County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Edward Ewing
Respondent:
Hale County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Goode v. Hale County Sheriff
as 5:2022cv00280
Petitioner:
Stanley R Goode
Respondent:
Hale County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
