Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Snow v. Roemer
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jarrod Snow
Defendant:
USDC WDNY Magistrate Roemer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lantigua v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06165
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lantigua
Defendant:
City of New York, NYPD Officer Nicholas Angello and NYPD Officers JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, individually and in their official capacity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spencer v. Christensen
as 9:2022cv00259
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Spencer
Respondent:
D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shoy v. Annucci
as 1:2022cv00084
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Shoy
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodges v. Lorenzo et al
as 9:2021cv01166
Plaintiff:
Antoine Hodges
Defendant:
Sgt. P. Lorenzo, Deputy Richardson, Deputy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redd v. Medtronic Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv06448
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Redd
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc. and Westchester Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snow v. NYS DOCCS Commissioner et al
as 1:2021cv00340
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jarrod Snow
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS Commissioner and Anthony Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romaine v. State of New York et al
as 9:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Romaine
Defendant:
State of New York, Superintendent Theresa Tynon, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff v. Reardon
as 1:2021cv00703
Petitioner:
Lorenzo McGriff
Respondent:
Superintendent DOC Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2021cv00107
Defendant:
Erica Saxton, Danielle Tope, Medical Department/Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
