Cases 1 - 10 of 26
ALMOS v. CRUTHERS
as 2:2022cv05636
Plaintiff:
LOVE ALMOS
Defendant:
JEFFERY CRUTHERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2022cv02768
Petitioner:
JUSTIN LOVE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LUNDY v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv20184
Petitioner:
STEVEN LOVE LUNDY
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOVE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2020cv01520
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
LEMONT LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOVE v. JOHN DOES 1-9 et al
as 3:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
KELVIN RAY LOVE
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-9, JOHN DOES 1-4, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07037
Plaintiff:
DERRICK LOVE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. COUNTY OF CAPE MAY et al
as 1:2016cv03461
Plaintiff:
BOBBY LOVE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAPE MAY, CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER MEDICAL PROVIDER, HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2016cv02586
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIDDLESEX COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02017
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS , EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON , PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv04404
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , NORTHERN STATE PRISON , GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
