Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Boyd v. Miles City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Banner Boyd
Defendant:
Miles City Police Dept., Ryan Ketchum, Jesse Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Beaverhead County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nelson
Defendant:
Beaverhead County Detention Center, Silverbow County Public Defender's Office and Walter Hennessy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00005
Petitioner:
David Wayne Nelson
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nault v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Ms. Alstead, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Nault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahseelah v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00064
Defendant:
Ms. Alstead, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mahseelah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peltier v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00065
Defendant:
Ms. Alstead, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gene Peltier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Ms. Alstead, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Ms. Alstead, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Henderson and Daniel Joseph Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bearcomesout v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Ms. Alstead, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Mahpevanahan Lorne Bearcomesout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denny v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Ms. Alstead, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Denny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
