Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Franklin v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
William Bill Johnson, Rebecca J. Walden and District Attorney's of Glynn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHOICKET v. DILLS
as 3:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
REBECCA D SCHOICKET
Respondent:
WARDEN ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schoicket v. Dills
as 1:2022cv03908
Petitioner:
Rebecca D. Schoicket
Respondent:
Warden Allen Dills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv05077
Plaintiff:
Delwin Berry
Defendant:
Edwina Johnson, William Danforth, Robert Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2021cv04539
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Cobb County, Rebecca Keaton and Darlene Corbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03396
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Christopher Lee Bishop, Sylvia Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Johnson et al
as 5:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Delwin M. Berry
Defendant:
Edwina Johnson, William Danforth, Robert Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. FLOURNOY et al
as 1:2020cv04468
Defendant:
Rebecca Keaton, Robert E. Flournoy, III and Vic Reynolds
Plaintiff:
JERRY W SPENCER and Jerry W. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
