Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 392
Hughes v. Bobby Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv02178
Plaintiff: Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin, Harris County, Fort Bend County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nadeau v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner: Nicholas Ryan Nadeau
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker v. Mills
as 3:2024cv01064
Plaintiff: Jamison Whitaker
Defendant: Officer Ryan Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Jay Hileman et al
as 4:2024cv01565
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Williamson
Defendant: Jay Hileman, Ryan McConnell and Christopher Petrowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Risperdaul
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Ryan Clark Ross
Defendant: Risperdaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner: Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner: Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Cerliano et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: Kenneth Baker
Defendant: Sheriff Maxey Cerliano, Cpl. Devon Fuller, Cpl. Ryan Rimlinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00994
Petitioner: Ryan Jivaro Whitaker
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shilling v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Ryan Joel Shilling
Respondent: FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?