Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Valley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Jeffery E. Martin
Respondent:
Warden Randy Valley and Idaho State Commission of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. Gov. Little, et al.
as 1:2022cv00504
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher
Respondent:
Gov. little, Jan Bennits, Anthony geddes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belcher v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv00472
Petitioner:
Camron Belcher and Shawn Lasater
Respondent:
Governor Brad Little, Ada County Prosecutor, Judge Reardon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinkson v. The United State of America, et al.
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
David R Hinkson
Defendant:
The United State of America, Richard Tallman, Edward J Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2021cv00300
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alexander
Defendant:
State of Idaho, John Doe Martin, John Doe Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2020cv00259
Defendant:
Gary Hartgrove, Ashley Dowell, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2019cv00250
Defendant:
R Winter, Campbell, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala et al v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
R Winter, Campbell, Randy Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus George Ayala and Gregory Joseph Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00265
Plaintiff:
Daisy Meadows
Defendant:
Henry Atencio, Rona Siegert, Howard Yordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
