Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Charging Crow v. Morgan et al
as 4:2023cv04200
Plaintiff:
Delbert W. Charging Crow, Jr.
Defendant:
Felicia Morgan, Sgt. Rower, Cassandra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iron Crow v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv05065
Plaintiff:
Marlon Dean Iron Crow, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crow Dog v. USA
as 3:2015cv03007
Plaintiff:
Ina Crow Dog
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crow Ghost v. Dooley
as 4:2015cv04065
Petitioner:
Mario Crow Ghost
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Marty Jackley, Jennifer Standwick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charging Crow v. Young et al
as 4:2013cv04027
Plaintiff:
Delbert Charging Crow, Jr.
Defendant:
Darin Young, Medical Staff and Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow Eagle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 4:2012cv04069
Plaintiff:
Gilbert D. Crow Eagle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Paul Schorder, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow Eagle v. United States Marshal's Service et al
as 3:2012cv03012
Plaintiff:
Gilbert O. Crow Eagle
Defendant:
United States Marshal's Service, Paul Schorder, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charging Crow v. Weber et al
as 4:2010cv04024
Plaintiff:
Delbert Charging Crow, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Judy Spurrow, Clifton Fantroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv05095
Petitioner:
Gary Crowe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Crowe v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv03030
Petitioner:
Gary Crowe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
