Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Sellers v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Donnie Mack Sellers
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Kristy Cobban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Butte Silver Bow Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Brett Berry
Defendant:
Butte Silver Bow Detention Center, J.P. Gallagher, Silver Bow County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blodgett v. Silver Bow Detention Center et al
as 2:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
James Robert Blodgett
Defendant:
Silver Bow Detention Center, Mark Johnson, Officer Ray Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spani v. USA
as 2:2023cv00091
Petitioner:
Mark Ernest Spani
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Benton v. USA
as 1:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Mark Eugene Benton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kittrell v. Darnell et al
as 9:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Toby Kittrell
Defendant:
Kate Darnell, Tara Kattell, Ryan Mickelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Mark William Collins
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bartsch v. House et al
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Zachary Thomas Bartsch
Defendant:
Angel House, Mark Johnson, John Sestrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. McCarthy
as 9:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
John Thurlow Mosby
Defendant:
Mark Lynn McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
