Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Greathouse v. Bragg et al
as 1:2024cv06335
Defendant:
Kimberlee Myers, Santiago, Mergeche and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Greathouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Keith McKinney
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Warwick New York Village Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv10405
Plaintiff:
Ivan G. McKinney
Defendant:
Warwick New York Village Police Department, Off. John Doe and City of Warwick New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. USA
as 6:2021cv06656
Petitioner:
Kevin E. McKinney
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Goodwin v. McKinney et al
as 2:2021cv01672
Plaintiff:
Alie Goodwin
Defendant:
Lupewig and McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Miller
as 1:2019cv05312
Petitioner:
William D. McKinney
Respondent:
C. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05320
Plaintiff:
Michael McKinney
Defendant:
NYC Department of Corrections, Manhattan Detention Center, N.Y.C. Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Sposato et al
as 1:2017cv05126
Plaintiff:
Bryan Christian
Defendant:
Grievance Office Coordinator, Corporal McKinney, C.O. Saeed (Saiid) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Miller et al
as 9:2015cv01019
Petitioner:
Darrell McKinney
Respondent:
Christopher Miller and Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Nassau County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2014cv07330
Plaintiff:
Glen Campbell
Defendant:
Sergeant Curtin, McKinney, Nassau County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
