Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Murphy v. Brown
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael Earl Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Murphy
Defendant:
John Doe and State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. USA
as 1:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Adrin Maurice Murphy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sims v. Murphy et al
as 4:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Coradell V. Sims
Defendant:
Ben Murphy, Joseph Keene and Bill Rasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carbin v. Tate County Board of Sup. et al
as 3:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Carbin
Defendant:
Tate County Board of Sup., Circuit Court Tate County, Dist. Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00023
Defendant:
Mary Ann Jones, Charlis Dukes, Ruth Saucier and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ramsey v. Management Training & Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv00195
Defendant:
Sgt. L. McDavid, Management Training & Corporation, Manning and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Alexander Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hill et al
as 3:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Paul A. Hill, Frank W. Hill, William Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davenport et al
as 3:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Torey Cortez Smith
Defendant:
Cully Davenport, Dexter Gates, Chip Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sappington v. Stanton et al
as 3:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
William Carl Sappington
Defendant:
Johnny Stanton, Arnie McMullen, Margaret Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
