Cases 1 - 10 of 93
GARCIA v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02877
Plaintiff:
AGUSTIN GARCIA
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., PATRICK A. NOGAN, EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. ROYCE et al
as 3:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
RAK RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
RAYMOND ROYCE, MARSHAL FLETCHER, MICHAEL CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANGELINA v. HICKS et al
as 3:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ANGELINA
Defendant:
MARCUS HICKS, VICTORIA KUHN, DR. ARTHUR BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TOMASETTO v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv03177
Defendant:
OFC. B. COOPER, MAJOR COSSABOON, CHRISTY RALPH and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD TOMASETTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL et al
as 2:2020cv01412
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON, THE BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMIR THOMAS and RALPH TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SONNIE v. RIDOLPHINO et al
as 1:2020cv00808
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER WELLMAN, ATLANTIC COUNTY & STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RALPH RIDOPLHINO and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN N. SONNIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2019cv15775
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SERGEANT NEGREN, BRIAN M. HUGHES, GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv08938
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
RALPH JOVAN DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DENNIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00893
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
RALPH DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ARTIS v. ORTIZ
as 1:2018cv14220
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Petitioner:
EDDIE RALPH ARTIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
