Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Russell v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Russell, III
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Golden et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Larry Lavonne Berry
Defendant:
Golden, Amarillo, Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazelais v. Ouellette et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Wilner C Bazelais
Defendant:
Russell Ouellette, Matthew R DeFilippo, R Jimminez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Russel Mechling v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF RUSSELL MECHLING, BY ITS EXECUTOR ELLEN ULMER and Estate of Russel Mechling
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jordan v. Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Russell
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nicole Thibeault and Michael Clements
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Payne et al
as 3:2021cv00637
Defendant:
Russell, Papoosha, Payne and others
Plaintiff:
Kendall Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Santiago et al
as 3:2020cv01545
Plaintiff:
Chad Clark
Defendant:
Russell, Papoosha, Cavanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Cook et al
as 3:2020cv01462
Defendant:
Dave Myga, Jullian Russell, Anthony Corcella and others
Plaintiff:
George Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
