Cases 1 - 10 of 221
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Cortez et al
as 4:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Randy Simmons
Defendant:
Joaquin Cortez, Judge Russell Cavendar, Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
JUAN MONTES VARGAS
Defendant:
DR HARRIS and Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Tashee M. James
Defendant:
Officer Johnson, Officer B. Cunningham, Sergeant Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winn v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Winn
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Sheriff Deputy Zachary Cuonzo-Simmons, Sheriff Deputy Brandon Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. CORECIVIC INC et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
HARRINGTON CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CORECIVIC INC, Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN, NANCY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUDHANI v. WASHBURN
as 4:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
MAHEMOOD BUDHANI
Defendant:
Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
