Cases 1 - 10 of 25
GASTONG v. STEWART et al
as 1:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
STEWART, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC FLORIDA, BROCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEWART-BEY v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv02981
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. STEWART-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, QUINCY L. BOOTH and LENNARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv01372
Plaintiff:
IVAN L. ROBINSON
Defendant:
STEWART, HULL, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB-EL
as 1:2017cv01111
Plaintiff:
KEITH BRYANT WEBB-EL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT, A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITLEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv02270
Plaintiff:
CHARLESTON E. WHITLEY
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, MICHAEL BLOOMBERG, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ATCHINSON et al
as 1:2016cv02142
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES, LAFAYETTE DOTSON, ADONNIS ATCHINSON and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, PHIL MENDELSON, KENNYAN MUDUFFIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. RIVERSIDE COUNTY COURT
as 1:2014cv00865
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC STEWART
Defendant:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00245
Petitioner:
MOMOLU B. STEWART
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STEWART v. WAINWRIGHT et al
as 1:2012cv00509
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL A. STEWART
Respondent:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JED LINEBERRY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al,
as 1:2011cv02056
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ROCKY PATTERSON
Plaintiff:
JED STEWART LINEBERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
