Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Corron v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Justin Corron
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Garlands Welding & Mechanical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Parker v. USA - 2255
as 8:2023cv01491
Petitioner:
Thomas Parker, III
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Parker v. Warden
as 1:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Parker
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Moubarek et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Parker
Defendant:
Mohamed Moubarek and Thomas Gera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Armstead et al
as 1:2022cv00942
Petitioner:
Baye J. Parker
Respondent:
Warden Laura Armstead and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corron v. Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Justin Corron
Defendant:
Division of Corrections, Central Maryland Correctional Facility, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase, Jr. v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02174
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, Eastern Correctional Institution, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Chase, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Parker v. USA - 2255
as 1:2020cv01738
Petitioner:
Arthur Parker
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parker v. USA - 2255
as 1:2020cv01739
Petitioner:
Theodore Earnell Parker
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parker v. Wicomico County Sheriff's Office
as 8:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Wicomico County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lindelle Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
