Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MIDDLEBROOKS v. SALCEDO et al
as 2:2023cv21601
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
K. SALCEDO, J WATKINS, RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATKINS v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2022cv05870
Petitioner:
DONALD WATKINS
Respondent:
PATRICK A. NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATKINS v. MERRIEL et al
as 3:2019cv21966
Defendant:
OFFICER MERRIEL, OFFICER LEWIS, SUE SPINGLER and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS et al v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2019cv00059
Defendant:
STEVE JOHNSON, GARY M. LANIGAN and JOHN DOE #1
Plaintiff:
CLINT WALKER and JESSE WATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2018cv16793
Plaintiff:
TONY FISHER and KELLIE REHANNA
Defendant:
ANNA MORFE, UNIT DOE, MR. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06642
Plaintiff:
KEYON WATKINS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLMAN v. JOHN DOE et al
as 1:2016cv01688
Plaintiff:
MARVIN TILLMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, WARDEN KIRBY, WATKIN-WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. COUNTY OF CAPE MAY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2015cv06738
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM JONES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAPE MAY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GARY G. SCHAFER, WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSO v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2015cv05703
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RUSSO
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, PLOUSIS, E.J.S.P PAROLE COUNSELORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LOMBARDO et al
as 1:2014cv03739
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM JONES
Defendant:
DONALD J. LOMBARDO, GARY G. SCHAFFER, JOHN D. MAHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
