Cases 1 - 10 of 140
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mouzon v. Alameda County
as 4:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Mouzon
Defendant:
Alameda County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Martinez v. San Joaquin County Sheriff
as 2:2023cv01323
Petitioner:
Alfonso Henry Martinez
Respondent:
San Joaquin County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Thompson v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00504
Petitioner:
Alfonso Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cunningham v. Ramos et al
as 3:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lynn Cunningham, Jr.
Defendant:
Alfonso Ramos and Jessica Mora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Reyna v. Cisneros
as 2:2022cv02295
Petitioner:
Antonio Alfonso Reyna
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfonso Munoz Alegria v. Dave Clark
as 5:2022cv01992
Petitioner:
Alfonso Munoz Alegria
Respondent:
Dave Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alegria v. Clark
as 3:2022cv01731
Petitioner:
Alfonso Munoz Alegria
Respondent:
Dave Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes et al
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Rudie Jaramillo and Rudie Anthony Jaramillo
Defendant:
Joseph Burnes, Alfonso Garcia, A. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
