Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Brooks v. Fogle
as 3:2024cv00914
Defendant:
Mrs. Chris Ann Fogle, Damien and Mustafa
Plaintiff:
Dale D.E. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Anglea et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant:
C. Anglea, Mr. Brooks and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Borton v. Matteucci et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Borton
Defendant:
Delores Matteucci, Oregon Health Authority, Oregon State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
InTrustment Northwest, Inc. v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
InTrustment Northwest, Inc.
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Vivek Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strobel v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv01791
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Robert Strobel
Defendant:
United States of America, J. Salazar, D. Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Tsham et al
as 3:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Barnett
Defendant:
Capt. Jeff Tsham, Dep. Susan Fleming, Lt. Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Bennett et al
as 2:2019cv01102
Defendant:
J. Olive, J. Carjal, C. Ford and others
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Towers et al
as 6:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Defendant:
Christina Towers, Brian Stephen, Corey Fhuere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Fogle et al
as 2:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
Dale D.E. Brooks
Defendant:
Chris Ann Fogle, Damien, Mustafa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Polk County et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County, Mark Garton, Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
