Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Tommy Taylor, Pelicia E. Hall and Marshal Turner
Plaintiff:
Benny Blansett, Steven Barnes, Darkeyus Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Mason
as 3:2019cv00630
Respondent:
Victor Mason
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Terrence Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kimble v. Coffeeville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tyrowone Kimble
Defendant:
Coffeeville Police Dept., Grant Gammill , Mark Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Banks
as 3:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Timothy Burns
Defendant:
J. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burns v. USA
as 3:2016cv00445
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Jamaras Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burns v. Gillespie
as 3:2013cv00333
Plaintiff:
Justin Noel Burns
Defendant:
Douglas Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Burns v. Korger Groceies Memphis, TN et al
as 4:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel J. Burns
Defendant:
Korger Groceies Memphis, TN, Juec Jungle Butler, Alabama, Dewayen Company Drivers Commercial CDL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 3:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Edward V. Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Miranda Rankin, Shirley Speight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2012cv00191
Petitioner:
Charles Alton Burns
Respondent:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
