Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Barnes v. TDCJ
as 3:2024cv01038
Petitioner:
MonQuas Barnes
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nevon Barnes
Defendant:
Warden FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barnes v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 9:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Nevon Barnes
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lewisbey v. Corunjal et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Bey and David Lewisbey
Defendant:
Michael D Corunjal, FNU Stearns, D Freshour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02816
Petitioner:
Bernard Kirk Barnes
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03580
Petitioner:
Cameron Jonarin Barnes and Cameron Jon Barnes
Respondent:
Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barnes v. Easter et al
as 1:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Willie Leon Barnes
Defendant:
FNU Easter, FNU Hughes, FNU Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Constable C. Barnes et al
as 4:2023cv03447
Plaintiff:
Paulangel Mendoza
Defendant:
Constable C. Barnes and Detention Officer in the Joint Processing Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Stephens et al
as 1:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Mark Barnes
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Shawnburger and FNU Guillory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Upshaw
as 6:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Michael Upshaw, Phillip Kent Lucas, Deana Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
