Cases 1 - 10 of 15
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASTILLO v. TUTT et al
as 1:2020cv01003
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL R CASTILLO and MIGUEL CASTILLO
Defendant:
ELAM and J TUTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Tutt et al
as 3:2020cv00254
Plaintiff:
Miguel R Castillo and Miguel Castillo
Defendant:
Elam and J Tutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTILLO v. W.V.C.F. et al
as 2:2018cv00205
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN and W.V.C.F.
Petitioner:
JOSEPH P. CASTILLO
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASTILLO v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv00181
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN and W.V.C.F.
Petitioner:
JOSEPH CASTILLO
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARREOLA-CASTILLO v. USA
as 1:2017cv03437
Petitioner:
JESUS ARREOLA CASTILLO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ARREOLA-CASTILLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv02118
Petitioner:
JESUS ARREOLA-CASTILLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ARREOLA CASTILLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00869
Petitioner:
JESUS ARREOLA CASTILLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ARREOLA CASTILLO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv00475
Petitioner:
JESUS ARREOLA CASTILLO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CANO-CASTILLO v. USA
as 1:2013cv01811
Petitioner:
ABEL CANO-CASTILLO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
