Cases 1 - 10 of 365
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Castillo Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02779
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Castillo v. Saldana, et al.
as 5:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
John Castillo
Defendant:
Officer FNU Saldana and Bexar County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hebert v. Brazoria County et al
as 3:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Herbert, Jr. and Robert Alan Hebert, Jr.
Defendant:
Brazoria County, Justice Peace Castillo, Bo Stahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez-Castillo v. USA
as 2:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Gutierrez-Castillo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Searcy v. Castillo et al
as 4:2023cv03647
Plaintiff:
Bradley Searcey and Bradley Searcy
Defendant:
Officer Castillo and Officer Chany
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales Castillo v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00356
Petitioner:
Richard Morales Castillo
Defendant:
Senior Warden Donald Muniz
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castillo-Rubio v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Luis Guillermo Castillo-Rubio
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
San Miguel et al v. Jack et al
as 1:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Samuel San Miguel and Martin Lujan
Defendant:
Christy Jack, Marsha McLane, Jessica Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
